Showing posts with label legislation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label legislation. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 03, 2011

Check out this year's proposed legislation #SigEpConclave

Going to Conclave as a Delegate or Alternate? Curious about what the hot topics will be this year?

Find out here, then come back and lets discuss:  Check out this year's proposed legislation.

Oh, never mind. Here they are, at least the first eleven of them. You may be certain there will be more by the time we get to Phoenix. 
Links to resolutions:
Resolution 1 - Add LHON as a National Philanthropy
Resolution 2 - SigEp Partnership with the Autism Society of America
Resolution 3 - Chapters to Achieve Above the Local Campus All Men's Average GPA
Resolution 4 - Establish Pledging Periods of 8 weeks or less
Resolution 5 - Financial Reporting of Chapter Operations to Headquarters
Resolution 6 - Clarification of References in the Grand Chapter Bylaws
Resolution 7 - Sigma Phi Epsilon Manpower Requirement for Chartering
Resolution 8 - Order of Succession of Undergraduate Officers
Resolution 9 - Adding the Vice President of Philanthropy to the Executive Committee 
Resolution 10 - Equitable billing for deferred recruitment chapters
Resolution 11 - Veterans of Foreign Wars Foundation as a National Philanthropy Partner

...And there you have them. However I am not very enthusiastic about the crop so far. 

(1,2,9,11) With no less than three philanthropies all attempting to gain "official" recognition I am inclined to endorse "None of the above." When you add to that the proposal to elevate the VP Philanthropy to an EC level - I wonder if the next step is to have the members soliciting on street corners on football weekends.

(5,6,8) The "Housekeeping" resolutions about order of succession, financial reporting, and rewording references, are run-of-the-mill so no drama there.

(3) The chapter GPA alteration may help some chapters qualify for a Buc Cup that otherwise would not, but really - who will really care about a "stern warning letter" from headquarters?

(7) Do we really want to encourage a chapter to form with so few people that it is immediately in danger of manpower related difficulties? Is it economically responsible to allow formation of a chapter that will require resources out of proportion to its contribution to the Fraternity for a probable extended period, only to risk failure after a few years? There really is a minimum chapter size to be viable. 

(4) Setting the pledge period is another symbolic gesture that will upset the 20% of chapters who still use a pledge model. When the schools require it they comply without need of intervention from HQ. Why not (and this is only mildly rhetorical) bite the bullet and declare that the era of the pledge model is over at SigEp? 

(10) "Equitable Billing" may be reasonable. I have heard complaints about how the current system overcharges deferred recruitment chapters. On the other hand, it uses a rather complex formula for calculating who should actually be counted, and it looks like there is a potential loss of revenue for HQ - which will have to be made up somewhere. Of course if the chapters actually did what is called for in the BMP, i.e. continuous recruitment and challenge completion ceremonies based on individual achievement rather than 'by class', wouldn't this become a moot point?

It is probably a good thing I am not a delegate. I might start a Tea-Party style filibuster and we would be in Phoenix until October!

Friday, August 14, 2009

Conclave update - girls allowed in Ritual?

It has been a full day with interesting legislative developments.

At the Ritual presentation yesterday, many members were startled to notice a woman among the crew handling the special lighting for the event. Then they realized that none of the crew were SigEps. And they saw our ritual. And heard ALL the private parts. Along with the full interpretation. Err, oops. Cue outrage.

A hastily written resolution (#16) requiring that only SigEps participate in the stagecraft of the Ritual was sent to the Grand Chapter and passed on to the Ritual committee for examination. The committee listened to arguments for both sides, then recomended defeat. The compelling argument was apparently one of practicality - you can't find and equip a crew of all SigEp initiates for a Ritual in front of several hundred.

I'll save you the parlimentary slight-of-hand, but the resolution was almost not brought to the floor. Once it was before the legislature and a final vote taken - it was nontheless defeated.

Now, if I were one of the alarmist TV pundits, I would say we have just declared that our "Sacred Ritual" is no longer secret, private, or even just for SigEps. Imagine the thoughts of a new member who has not participated yet when he finds out that non-SigEp people were allowed to see what he can't.

I'll bet there will be more discussion on this...

Wednesday, July 15, 2009

Proposed SigEp Conclave legislation

In a triumph of transparency, HQ has released the list of resolutions to be discussed and decided on in Orlando.

The resolutions range from mere houskeeping (change references to the housing corporations's name for acuracy and consistancy) to changes in membership procedures and fee collections that could affect undergraduate members for years to come. Of course there are the usual boondoggles and this year's flavor of a "Worthy Cause" (decide for yourself which is which), and in this writers opinion there is room for a few more. The details for "How To" submit legislation are not exactly easy to find, but they can be found, and these resolutions can be uses as a guide to writing them up.
    List of Titles of Proposed Legislation
  1. Bylaws and Administrative Policies and Procedures, Sections C.1. and C.8 —National Housing Corporation of Sigma Phi Epsilon
  2. Sigma Phi Epsilon SAFE HOUSE Program
  3. Condition of Ritual Equipment
  4. Legislative Procedure for Grand Chapter Conclave
  5. Chapters to Achieve Above the Local Campus All Men's Average GPA
  6. Establish Pledging Periods of 8 weeks or less
  7. Clarification of Fee Increases in the Grand Chapter Bylaws
  8. Defining order of Chapter Officers Elections
  9. National Board of Directors Executive Committee Composition
  10. Simplification of Collection of Member Fees
  11. Sigma Phi Epsilon Employee Exceptional Service Recognition
Full PDF files of each resolution are available from the Conclave Resolution page.

We will probably have a few comments on individual items after we wade through them, so stay tuned!

Thursday, July 17, 2008

Family Settles $4.2 Million Hazing Death Suit

Family Reaches settlement in pledge’s death
Associated Press

Proceeds from a $4.2 million settlement of a lawsuit against a fraternity will be used to educate fraternity and sorority members about the dangers of binge drinking.

The family of a University of Texas student -- Jack Phoummarath (FOO'-mah-rahth) -- who died of alcohol poisoning after a fraternity binge-drinking party announced the settlement yesterday.

The 18-year-old's body was found in 2005 in a garage apartment near a fraternity house. His family sued the Lambda Phi Epsilon national and Austin chapters and some individual members.

The Houston Chronicle reported that his sister Marion said the family wanted to develop the video to prevent other deaths.

Together with UT officials, the family is also establishing an $8,000 to $10,000 annual scholarship in Phoummarath's memory. Scholarship recipients will be required to attend a binge-drinking awareness program.

Three officers of the fraternity received probation after a criminal investigation into Phoummarath's death.

On the Web:
18-minute Jack Phoummarath Memorial Video: http://www.inmemoryofjack.com/.

from another source

Family of Victim in University Alcohol Hazing Incident Tries to Raise Awareness
Fox 26 News (Houston)

The family of a University of Texas Freshman who died during a fraternity hazing binge drinking party is turning its tragedy into a campaign to save lives. Eighteen-year-old Jack Phoummarath died of acute alcohol poisoning during a Lambda Phi Epsilon initiation in December of 2005. His family is using proceeds from its $4.2 Million dollar lawsuit settlement for a widespread educational effort to warn young people about the dangers of hazing and binge drinking.Part of the family's campaign includes a powerful, graphic video entitled "Enough is Enough."

The video, available at www.inmemoryofjack.com, includes actual footage and photos of Jack's own hazing process, which led to his death. Lambda Phi Epsilon President Benny Chan, Pledge Captain Andrew Nguyen, and Hell Master Kamal Pulukuri each pleaded no contest to a charge of hazing, in connection with Jack's death, and received deferred adjudication probation. As part of their plea agreements, all three provided interviews for the video, which is now being circulated to colleges and universities across the country.

"He (Phoummarath) was encouraged to drink, kind of in a celebratory manner. We screwed up, and we didn't pay attention," Pledge captain Andrew Nguyen said.Phoummarath's sister, Marian Phoummarath, said the video is meant to open students' eyes to what they could possibly be getting themselves into.
"This is not an anti-Greek video, but these are some of the dangers that can be involved if you become involved in organizations like this," she said.

She says the family hopes it will also help parents to begin a dialogue with their kids on the dangers of binge drinking.The Phoummaraths are also working with U-T to set up a full scholarship in Jack's name, each year, for a student who will prepares and executes a binge drinking awareness program.

"We hope that through this case and these educational opportunities, the dangerous activities that many fraternities sponsor will be curtailed", Family Attorney Randy Sorrels said. "When alcohol and hazing become a priority in a fraternity or sorority, things need to change."

In addition, an award-winning documentary, The Pledge, chronicling the life and tragic death of Jack Phoummarath, has been produced. The Twin Lion Communications film received a Platinum Award at the 2008 Houston International Film Festival.

Meanwhile, House Bill 2639 takes effect on September 1st, requiring fraternities, sororities, and social organizations at every Texas college and university to go through training on the dangers of hazing and binge drinking.

Monday, June 23, 2008

In Loco Parentis for the new millenium

Stephen Yeargin passed along this notice from the Nashville "Tennessean." Coming as it does on the heels of the Texas Announcement you have to wonder if this is the start of a trend toward more restrictive campuses.
State colleges and universities will have to notify parents of students who are disciplined for alcohol or drug violations.

Gov. Phil Bredesen signed the measure last week. It applies to students who are younger than 21 years old.
Advertisement

Sen. Roy Herron, a Dresden Democrat, has said Tennessee is the first state in the country to adopt such a law.
An aside: I knew Roy Herron when we were at Tennessee in the '70s. He is a good ol' boy in the best sense of the term and has always been politically active. I was a Republican back then (I got better) but he has always been a 'yellow dog' Democrat and proud of it.

Colleges, universities will have to inform parents of students' violations | www.tennessean.com | The Tennessean

Friday, February 29, 2008

Vermont Latest to Eye Lower Drinking Age

Old enough to vote; old enough to fight and die in Iraq; old enough to buy tobacco and get started on a serious case of lung cancer; but not old enough to drink? Where is the logic in that?
"Our laws aren't working. They're not preventing underage drinking. What they're doing is putting it outside the public eye," Vermont state Sen. Hinda Miller said. "So you have a lot of kids binge drinking. They get sick, they get scared and they get into trouble and they can't call because they know it's illegal."

On Thursday, a committee of the Vermont Senate approved Miller's bill to have a task force weigh the pros and cons of rolling back the drinking age and make a recommendation to the Legislature early next year.
[...]
[L]ast year, former Middlebury College president John McCardell started Choose Responsibility, a nonprofit that favors allowing 18- to 20-year-olds to legally buy booze once they've completed an alcohol education program.

"We don't simply advocate the lower age, but believe mandatory alcohol education and licensing with very strict enforcement for violations of the state's alcohol laws might work," McCardell said.

Mothers Against Drunk Driving and others call this folly to even consider, saying the higher age limit has saved thousands of lives since the 1984 enactment of the National Minimum Drinking Age Act. The act required states to raise the age to 21 or lose federal transportation money.

"Is there any significant support in the U.S. Congress for changing the law? We don't see that," said Chuck Hurley, CEO of MADD.

Typically, when states flirt with the idea, they quickly abandon it for fear of losing the highway funding, he said.
What would the implications be for Greeks? If it is legal to drink at 18 would that lessen the liability in cases of alcohol related incidents ("He made his own choice, the Fraternity had no part.") Or would the number of problems increase to an unacceptable level (as if there is no drinking NOW)?

News from The Associated Press

Tuesday, September 18, 2007

FratPAC fundraiser in Houston

Last night several fraternity and sorority alumni gathered for a fundraising event in Houston. There were at least 8 SigEps, and as many or more from Alpha Chi Omega, along with smaller groups from several other organizations.

The gathering was sponsored by "The Fraternity and Sorority Political Action Committee" (FratPAC), a group that raises money and distributes it to elect Greeks to the House and Senate and influence legislation that is of interest to Greek organizations.

The focus of last nights was to raise awareness and support for the "Collegiate Housing and Infrastructure Act of 2007" (H.R. 643/S. 638), a bill that would extend tax deductible status to grants from charitable organizations (e.g. the Educational Foundation) to housing for campus organizations (i.e. fraternity and sorority houses). This bill currently has over 155 sponsors in the House and 31 in the Senate. Because it is a "small" and essentially non-controversial bill it is still in committee until it can be proposed as an amendment to a suitable tax or appropriations bill. We were asked to contact our Senators and Representatives and let them know we support this bill.

If you can take a few minutes to research the bill and contact your members of Congress it will be greatly appreciated. Even better, your chapter will thank you for it!

More information:
HR. 643 (opencongress.org)
S. 638 (opencongress.org)
Senators (opencongress.org)
Representatives (opencongress.org)

Friday, September 07, 2007

Congress Approves Student Loan Overhaul

We believe this bit of news is timely for the blog since many of the undergraduate members depend on student loans to pay for at least part of their college expenses.
Congress gave final approval to a broad overhaul of federal student loan programs today, sharply cutting subsidies to lenders and increasing grants to needy students.

In quick succession, both the House and Senate approved the changes, allowing Democrats to say they had made good on one of their campaign promises last year to ease the strain of rising college costs. In the Senate, the bill passed 79 to 12, reflecting broad bipartisan support, while in the House it passed in a voice vote.

The Education Secretary, Margaret Spellings, said that she was recommending that President Bush sign the bill because it “answered the president’s call to significantly increase funding” for Pell grants for low-income students. The administration had issued a veto threat against an earlier House version of the legislation.
[...]
The legislation, hammered out in a House-Senate conference committee this week, alters many of the ground rules for financing higher education, offering forgiveness on student loans to graduates who work for 10 years or more in public service professions like teaching, firefighting and the police, and limiting monthly payments on their loans to 15 percent of their discretionary income. It also raises the maximum Pell grant, the basic federal grant for middle- and low-income students, to $5,400 from its current level of $4,310 over the next four years. To pay for the changes it slashed federal subsidies to lenders by roughly $20 billion.
[...]
Representative George Miller of California, the Democratic chairman of the House education committee, said that last year, Republicans took nearly $12 billion from student Pell grants. “We took $11.39 billion and put it back into Pell grants,” Mr. Miller said. “That’s the difference that an election makes.”

Campaign trail promises aside, the changes reflect the steep and sudden decline in the fortunes of the $85 billion student loan industry, after years of generous subsidies and support in Congress. Investigations by Congress and the New York attorney general revealed a series of potential conflicts of interest as lenders had provided free travel, gifts, and financial incentives to colleges and college officials in the hope they would steer student borrowers their way.
[...]
With the law, Congress is reducing federal subsidies to lenders by roughly $20 billion and gradually halving the interest rate on student loans over the next five years. Some $11.4 billion of that money will go toward stepping up Pell grants.

For the first time, the government will now auction off the right to make federally-backed educational loans to parents in each state, instead of setting the rate from Washington. The two lowest bidders will win the right to make subsidized college loans to parents.
As always, the devil is in the details and the law of unintended consequenses is sure to apply. As a general principle however, any legislation that makes it easier to attend and pay for college is a pretty good thing.

Could it possibly be that the "Repugnicans" and "Demoncrats" are figuring out how to work together? Nah, that's way too much to hope for.

Congress Approves Student Loan Overhaul - New York Times

Tuesday, August 14, 2007

Conclave Legislation - Full List

Here is a link to the full 50th Grand Chapter Legislation. In all 27 pieces of legislation were introduced.

It is a PDF file so you will need Adobe Reader or equivalent to read it.

Friday, August 10, 2007

Conclave - Resolutions Round-Up

There are the usual mix of resolutions being proposed. Some good, some mundane, and some that make you wonder "What were they thinking?". Here is a sample. We will let you decide which category they belong to. Note - nearly all are still in the "committee" phase. Resolutions that have been definitively passed or defeated are indicated:

  • R 1. Ritual equipment must be kept complete and in good order. Failure to do so could result in Loss of charter.
  • R 2. (passed) If there is a vacancy for a District Governor in an area the HQ Executive Director may make Chapter Counselor appointments for that district.
  • R 5. Raise the Housing Fund fee from $20 to $25.
  • R 6. Rename the references to the National Housing Corp. to reflect the name of the new LLC created to satisfy tax requirements
  • R 7. (passed) All Alumni Boards (AVC) must appoint an ex-officio undergraduate member.
  • R 9. (defeated) Invocations and meal blessings are not to reference a specific religious denomination.
  • R 10. (passed) Encourge full use of the Ritual interpretation; HQ to get involved in making sure there is uniformity in the perfomance.
  • R 11. Add "Sound Spirit" to the "Sound Mind, Sound Body" slogan.
  • R 12. Create an "Alumni Senate" to vote on matters of Chapters' Finace, Assets, and Operations. Adoption of those matters would be subject to approval by both the "Alumni Senate" AND Grand Conclave legislative session.
  • R 13. Nominating committees may not have "interference" from uninvited "interested parties" while they are selecting nominees for NBD, Grand Pres., etc.

A reminder - all proposals and their ultimat disposition will be available on the HQ web site after Conclave concludes.

That's the update as of this morning. we will let the reader decide which of these proposals are "muck" that needs to be raked.

Wednesday, May 02, 2007

$$$ Needed for Greek Sprinkler Systems

Fraternities, sororities work to improve fire safety
Only 11 houses currently have sprinkler systems.

By Sam Wilson

Many of MU’s fraternities and sororities have five years to raise hundreds of thousands of dollars to equip their houses with sprinkler systems, thanks to a new Columbia City Council ordinance.

Debbie Sorrell, of the Columbia Fire Marshals, said five of the 13 sorority houses on campus have a full sprinkler system, but none of the six sorority annexes have sprinklers. Six of the 25 fraternity houses have sprinklers, as does one of three annexes. The houses and annexes that do not have sprinklers fall under the ordinance and are required to fully install them.

Sorrell said some houses have partially installed sprinkler systems, but exact figures were unavailable for partial systems, which vary in size.

Sigma Nu fraternity President Jacob Long said his chapter, whose house does not have sprinklers, is uncertain about how it will pay for the sprinklers, which are expected to cost between $125,000 and $150,000.

“Financially, it’s putting us into trouble,” he said.

Long’s chapter has sent letters to alumni asking for contributions. He said the plan is to install sprinklers while completing other renovations in the summer of 2008.
“It’s all up in the air right now,” he said.

Long said he feels the sprinklers are unnecessary, as there are few fraternity house deaths.

Chris Mabie, president of the UM-St. Louis Pi Kappa Alpha fraternity chapter, disagrees.

His chapter house was engulfed in a fire in December, and chapter member Brian Schlittler died when he couldn’t escape the house. Mabie said his chapter will install sprinklers in its new house, but the old house did not have them.

Although he doesn’t completely support the ordinance, Mabie said he does support the sprinklers.“If they can afford it, I’d definitely say it’s worth it,” he said.

Charles Roberts, president of the MU chapter of Sigma Phi Epsilon fraternity said his chapter will install sprinklers as part of a major renovation.

“I definitely am going to feel safer with a sprinkler system because a lot of houses are a bit sketchy in the way fires are handled,” he said.

Alpha Gamma Rho fraternity President Andrew Howard said the ordinance doesn’t affect his chapter. The fraternity had sprinklers installed in its house when it was built in 2001.

Howard said his chapter’s members feel safer now with the sprinklers in place.

“It does take a little worry away,” he said.

“It is nice to have a security blanket.”Chi Omega sorority President Kristin Lamvik said the ordinance is a blessing in disguise. She said her chapter is in the process of planning to build a new house, and this ordinance might lead to more alumni donations. Although she said she feels a sorority house is safer than a fraternity house and her house already has a good fire safety procedure, she said she thinks the sprinklers will help.

“I can see why it’s useful,” she said. “In a crisis situation, it would be good to have.”

Delta Chi fraternity President Robby Berlin said his chapter is focused on raising the money necessary to install sprinklers. The price is estimated at around $100,000. He said this process has other chapters considering drastic possibilities.

“I think a lot of houses are talking about bulldozing and starting over,” Berlin said.

Delta Sigma Phi fraternity President Brydan McNeely said his chapter is among those considering a new house. Retrofitting sprinklers into the current house would be cheaper, but he said the members of the fraternity want to build a new one.“It would almost be more cost effective,” he said.

McNeely said his fraternity’s alumni are reluctant to embrace the idea of a new home.

“As we get a little closer, I think we’re going to see a shift toward building a new house,” he said.

The financial burden on the chapters could be eased if pending federal legislation is passed. U.S. Rep. Stephanie Tubbs Jones, D-Ohio, has re-introduced legislation that would allow chapters to apply for federal grants to fund sprinkler systems.

“The records indicate that there needs to be improvement,” she said.

Tubb Jones was unable to provide a figure as to how much money the grants would provide.

According to a study published by the U.S. Fire Administration in November 2001, there are an average of 150 fraternity and sorority fires each year. These fires claim an average of 10 injuries or deaths and $2.1 million in property damage.

The report states eight students died in two fraternity house fires at Bloomsburg University in 1994 and 2000. One fire caused five deaths and the other three.

In 2005, the U.S. Fire Administration estimated there were 350 fires in Greek houses nationwide. They have record of one injury and no deaths.The study listed arson as the most common cause for Greek house fires. Open flame and cooking were a close second and third.

Tubbs Jones’ legislation would also make a sprinkler system donation to a chapter tax deductible.

“Anytime you provide a tax incentive to people, they are more likely to donate,” she said.

Tubbs Jones has introduced similar legislation in the past, but she said it has failed because others in Congress are not supportive of the loss of government revenue.

Zeta Tau Alpha sorority member Shannon Ferguson went to Capitol Hill in support of the legislation. Her chapter already has sprinklers, but she said she was representing more than just her sorority.

“It wasn’t about just going for my chapter,” Ferguson said. “It was for the entire MU campus.”

Ferguson said the legislation is an opportunity to equalize chapters and universities that already can receive tax-deductible donations.

“I think it was an important cause to put not-for-profit organizations on the same playing field,” she said.

Ferguson went to Capitol Hill with the Capital Fraternal Caucus, a group that campaigns representing Greek chapters nationwide.

Battalion Chief Steve Sapp of the Columbia Fire Marshals is the man behind the ordinance in Columbia. He said he likes the way the ordinance is written because it fits somewhere in the middle as far as the amount of time similar ordinances have given their constituents in other cities.

One of the controversies surrounding Sapp’s handling of the ordinance is over what type of system to install. The ordinance does not specify which of two types to use. Typically, when an engineer designs a sprinkler system for a non-residential structure, he or she designs the system to protect property. Sprinklers are put in all rooms and small closets.

When a residential system is designed, it is designed to protect lives, not just property. Sprinklers are left out of smaller rooms where people are unlikely to be. This makes a residential system less expensive.

Although members of the Greek community have suggested making the residential system explicitly permitted in the ordinance, Sapp is reluctant to change the ordinance.“I’m hesitant to do that because there are different spaces in a fraternity house or a sorority house,” Sapp said. “There’s obviously the sleeping rooms which comprise a residential, which we know comprise a lot of the building. But there’s also sometimes large meeting rooms, gathering rooms or dining rooms, kitchens and so forth, and a 13-(residential) system may not be appropriate there.”

Sapp said though the City Council has asked that he further discuss the ordinance with his constituents, he is generally happy with it.

“I don’t really think that the ordinance is crafted badly,” he said. “I think that people have some questions, and they’re wanting to know some direction right now. And we’re certainly prepared to help them with that direction, and that’s something that we stressed from the very start — that this is more of a partnership.”

But Sapp’s view of the process as a partnership is not unanimous. At meetings with Sapp, Larry Schuster, a member of Alpha Gamma Sigma fraternity’s housing corporation, said there was a lack of communication on Sapp’s part before the ordinance was proposed.

“It’s kind of hard for it to be a partnership when they do all the demanding,” Schuster said. “They did such a poor job of getting people involved. He totally failed to involve the constituency.”

Schuster said the ordinance mandates an unnecessary expenditure.

“Firemen always believe that there is no expense that should not be spared for one life,” he said. “Following that logic, we should park every vehicle, every bicycle, we should never ride horses, we shouldn’t even have fire trucks because people get killed on fire trucks.”

Saturday, April 14, 2007

Where in the world is... SigEp Travel?

In the words of Forrest Gump: "Whenever somebody says 'I am here to help you,' hold on to your wallet."

In the last week or so we have received at least two mass-generated emails touting "SigEp Travel" as the way to get good deals and also help fill the coffers at HQ. As a practical matter, this travel venture may very well be a way to 'brand' travel services that are competitive, if not always lowest priced. But some questions and considerations and considerations came to mind as we were looking over the proposals, and the deeper we went, the more concerned we got.

These mailouts were sent over the signature of our executive director, so it is reasonable to assume that he is at least aware of, and probably supports, this use of the fraternity email list. The first question that came to mind is "who authorized using the SigEp trademark for a commercial venture"? The fraternity is aggressive in making sure that providers of "Greek-ware" pay a license fee when using one of our trademarked words or symbols. Is there any potential for conflicts of interest? Was there any oversight for this venture? Did the NBD know of it and approve? "Inquiring minds want to know."

The SigEp "Privacy Policy" states, in part:
Your personal information is never intentionally shared outside the organization without your permission,...
Not only was there an apparent disregard for the written privacy policy, but there was no way to opt-out of future email solicitations, as required by law (CAN-SPAM act of 2003). This member is very concerned that these apparent legal and ethical shortcuts were taken.

How well does this particular venture fit with the Fraternity mission statement: "Building better leaders for the world's communities"? We fail to see how partnering with a travel service (or a credit card company for that matter) furthers the mission of Sigma Phi Epsilon. Rather, with all the convoluted payment schemes (see the paragraph on "MLM schemes" below) you have to wonder if we will need to dedicate a wing of "Zolly House" just to keep up with the nickles and dimes.

In one of the emails our esteemed executive director notes he has been using the service and "has found it to be cheaper than other services in many cases." That is interesting in itself since the engine behind the service is Travelocity.com, as interpreted by "YourTravelBiz.com", and they presumably are not using the service as a loss leader. But I digress (see next paragraph). If this is such a wonderful service then put a link to in on the HQ web site. In fact, for a small "click thru" charge I'm sure we can arrange to have the "Junkster" put an ad on the S&P site (it would get more eyeballs there!).

In fact, "YourTravelBiz.com" looks suspiciously like a Multi-Level-Marketing scheme, aka Pyramid. A testimonial on the website declares:
"One of YTB’s goals is to create more millionaires than any other company in the world. I am convinced 100% that YTB will also make my dream of becoming a millionaire a reality."
One wonders exactly where individual members of SigEp are on the pyramid? Presumably, there is someone 'up-line', as well as "SigEp Inc.", who is benefiting from travel booked on the site. Are they paying back a license fee? Again, this raises questions of disclosure and conflict of interest. Ultimately, is this something that we really want to be associated with?

The points above are more about disclosure and oversight than whether an action is permitted. To put it another way, it may be legal, but is it right?

Enough of a rant. Now for a call to action. We have a Conclave coming up where legislative action may be taken for the good of the Fraternity. There are some items of legislation that could come up as a result of this travel scheme, e.g.:
  • A definition of exactly what constitutes an appropriate use of the fraternity email list.
  • A definition of how the fraternity trademarks are (or are not) to be used in furtherance of a commercial venture.
  • A requirement that NBD, paid staff, and other officers disclose any significant interests in companies the National fraternity does business with.
There are probably more, but that is a start. Let's see if someone wants to write some proposals and have some fun in Hot-lanta.

From an undisclosed location, I am Diogenes and I approved this message.

Wednesday, March 28, 2007

Legislation That Will Impact Greek Life

This article was in the latest newsletter from "Omega Financial"


Legislation That Will Impact Greek Life

Omega Financial invites your participation today in a grassroots effort to support legislation that could substantially improve the Greek experience. Omega is working with Greek organizations and the Capital Fraternal Caucus, which promotes items of concern to the Greek world on Capital Hill, to encourage our members and partners to contact Congress to urge support of the Collegiate Housing and Infrastructure Act of 2007 (H.R. 643/S. 638). We are encouraging all Greek members, both students and alumni, to write Congress in support of this important legislation.

This Act would allow educational foundations to use tax-deductible charitable contributions to make grants to local house corporations; these grants can be used for improvements to an existing house or for building a new house. Passage of the Act would be a major benefit for fraternity and sorority housing nationwide, as it would make it easier to raise funds needed for critical safety enhancements and for other infrastructure improvements needed to sustain Greek housing.

An earlier version of the Collegiate Housing and Infrastructure Act passed the House of Representatives in 2003 as part of a larger bill, but it failed to pass the Senate for political reasons. When Congress ended its work in 2005, the bill had 151 House sponsors and 28 Senate sponsors, but we have to start all over again in 2007. As of March 7, 2007, we have 29 sponsors in the House and 9 sponsors in the Senate. A complete list of current sponsors can be found at: http://www.fraternalcaucus.org/node/156.

The more sponsors we have for this legislation, the more likely it is that the Collegiate Housing and Infrastructure Act will pass. Senators and Representatives often sign onto legislation because their constituents contact them and ask for support - your letters, emails and phone calls are key to our efforts.

Here's How To Help

Here's all you have to do to participate in the campaign:

  1. Log on to www.fraternalcaucus.org, locate the "Get Involved" tab at the top and click on "Register with the CFC". It will take about two minutes for you to provide some basic information Greek leaders can use in our grassroots program to target certain groups for additional contacts.
  2. After registering, go to the tab marked "Legislation" and click on "Write Your Legislators".
  3. Simply complete the steps there to a send an e-mail to members of your Congressional delegation. If you have a connection to other Members of Congress or Senators, you can write them as well.
Thanks for participating in this grassroots campaign! The more Greeks who contact Congress about this bill in 2007, the more likely we are to see this bill become law, so your participation is vital.

Wednesday, March 21, 2007

Think about Conclave

Conclave 2007 is coming soon. It is not too early to think about legislation. This interesting declaration from Sigma Phi Beta might start a conversation.

What do you think? Should Sig Ep adopt a similar policy?

Sigma Phi Beta Fraternity

Policy on Citizenship and Immigration Status

Mission Statement:

The Council of Sigma Phi Beta enacts this policy to provide further clarification on the Nondiscrimination and Harassment policies of the fraternity as they relate to national origin.


Values Statement:

Sigma Phi Beta Fraternity values brotherhood, diversity, leadership, education, scholarship, Greek Life, member rights, community service, tradition and the overall Queer experience in a hetero-normative society. Sigma Phi Beta Fraternity provides a safe space free from discrimination, while promoting diversity of cultures and backgrounds.


Membership Details:

No chapter or colony shall require members or prospective members to verify their citizenship or immigration status as a condition for membership in the Fraternity.

Powered By Blogger